These files represent an early attempt to make NotebookLM to produce a critique of other work, that is to read a paper or proposal from some external source and provide an understanding or critique using the ideas of a particular ‘voice’. That is to provide a response ‘how do the ideas of Stafford Beer relate to the paper being critiqued’

This is critically important in avoiding group think, for example on key issues such as Climate Change (and other popular delusions) we have the option peddled under the assertion that ‘the science is settled’. We need to tease out the scientific basis and predictions and study them on their own merit , by forming independent perspectives, and avoid the nonsense collectivism which present as ‘settled views’ Science is never settled!

My first attempt to add the piece to the specific authors collection did not work and led to a confusion of critic and the criticisied another aspect of poll