Directed Questioning
I was concerned that the selection of material, particularly
The file 'philip ladyman and ross ashby' is an AI summary of the three independent files can you compare and contrast its content with the three independent perspectives
What would you say to the assertion that it misses key detail from the works of ross ashby and largely ignores the content from warren weaver - are their any ways of adjusting the balance and emphasis in the query being used maintaining a balanced share of voice
How might you advise we develop queries to pull apart and keep separate different views in a source which consists of multiple pieces from separate authors
Can this be presented as a mermaid diagram
Can you analyse how and where one author embraces and extends the work of another authors in this collection
AI Serendipity
Along the way the chat sessions with Gemini suggested some intriguing questions - like the process of browsing the next book on the shelf it is a valuable technique to explore proximal knowledge
How does Weaver’s 'middle region' differ from disorganized complexity?
How do we measure the 'organic' nature of a complex system?
How does Ladyman's principle of naturalistic closure filter pseudo-scientific questions?